The UK's oldest environmental charity faces closure because its income has been hit by cuts to local authority budgets.
Environmental Protection UK was originally established in 1898 as the Coal Smoke Abatement Society.
It says it will stop functioning as a fully staffed and funded organisation in March 2012.
However, it hopes that it can carry on with at least some of its work on a voluntary basis.
Environmental Protection UK is a charity that provides expertise, advice and analysis on air quality as well as land, waste and noise issues.
Much of its income comes from local authorities through membership fees, publications and services.
As council budgets have come under pressure the charity says it has faced considerable financial challenges.
Outgoing Chief Executive James Grugeon said: "Local authorities have been forced in the past year to make very difficult funding decisions, following severe cuts to their budgets imposed by central Government.
"Within this economic environment, EPUK has faced an uphill battle to survive which, ultimately and despite our best efforts, we haven't been able to win."
The charity has its origins in the Coal Smoke Abatement Society (CSAS). It was founded by London artist Sir William Blake Richmond in response to winter smog caused by coal smoke.
The Great London Smog in 1952 is believed to have led to the deaths of up to 12,000 people.
CSAS's work contributed to the introduction of the 1956 Clean Air Act. Later it changed its name to the National Society for Clean Air (NSCA).
In October 2007 it was rebranded again to become Environmental Protection UK.
The organisation will close as a fully funded and staffed charity at the end of the financial year with the loss of 10 jobs.
However, it hopes that it can continue work if there is a commitment from members to continue on a voluntary basis. A decision is expected to be taken in January.
The charity recently launched the Healthy Air Campaign and says it is still committed to that and other projects.
Its Scottish division is looking at the possibility of becoming its own stand-alone organisation.more information...
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk
Justice Minister Ivo Opstelten said Thursday a test rollout in the southern cities of Noord-Brabant, Limburg and Zeeland will be delayed until May because of "practical difficulties," the Associated Press reports. The cities support the plan, hoping it will solve problems caused by German and Belgians who drive across the border just to buy the drug.Under a policy announced earlier this year, pot-selling shops will become members-only clubs restricted to Dutch residents over age 18. But Amsterdam is fighting the measure because opponents say it discriminates against foreigners and could lead to a sale of soft drugs on the streets."The Dutch government has decided upon this for the whole of the Netherlands. Amsterdam doesn't want it," Machteld Ligtvoet, a spokeswoman from the Amsterdam tourism board told CNN this summer."Coffee shops are not actively promoted by our organization and are not used in order to attract tourists," Ligtvoet added. "However, the mere idea that one can buy and use soft drugs here is an attractive aspect of Amsterdam and its famous spirit of freedom."Marijuana is technically illegal in the Netherlands, but coffee shop customers can buy up to five grams of cannabis.Even as the conservative Dutch government toughens its tolerance policy on marijuana, the AP notes, it is bucking worldwide trends by taking an increasingly relaxed stance toward tobacco smoking.Last year it exempted some bars from a smoking ban and now plans to cut spending on anti-smoking advertising campaigns and end funding for health care programs to help people kick the habit. Nearly half of the nation's bars and nightclubs flout the 2008 smoking ban but they're rarely punished.According to the Netherlands' National Organization for Tobacco Trade, Dutch consumers bought more than 4 billion euros ($5 billion) worth of tobacco products last year, the AP says. About 27 percent of people in the Netherlands smoke, slightly higher than other rich countries including Britain and the U.S.more information...
